This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Intel Iris Pro 580 (Mobile Skylake) performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions. I would be very curious to know whether a better cooling solution and more TDP headroom would allow the Iris Pro 580 to deliver closer to 50% more performance compared to the Iris Pro 6200. The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel Iris Pro 580 (Mobile Skylake) is just 3.46. This despite it having 72 CU against 48 of the latter, and a generational improvement. The latter link also gives 3d mark 11 comparison, where the Iris Pro 580 achieves a 14% improvement over the Iris Pro 6200. This is confirmed again by comparing the Firestrike score of 1900 vs 1770, as evidenced in: I based my estimate on the comparative results from. This ensures that all modern games will run on Iris Pro Graphics 580. Built on the 14 nm+ process, and based on the Skylake GT4e graphics processor, the device supports DirectX 12.
#INTEL IRIS PRO GRAPHICS 580 UPGRADE#
Thus, when gaming is concerned, the product fails to deliver on its promise and is not a real upgrade over GB-BXi7-5775.įrom what little comparative benchmarks I could find, it manages to be only 10-15% faster than that of the Iris Pro 6200 found in 5775c/5775r. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a mobile integrated graphics solution by Intel, launched on September 1st, 2015. My initial impression/suspicion is that the Skull Canyon NUC cooling solution is inadequate and is stifling the
I was searching through the forum, but couldn't find much if any discussion on the gaming performance of the
0 kommentar(er)
